Go Error Wrapping: Difference between revisions
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
These approaches can be combined: we can at the same time add more context and mark an error. | These approaches can be combined: we can at the same time add more context and mark an error. | ||
In all these cases, the source error remains available for further inspection. This is different from and more than [[Go_Language_Error_Handling#Annotate_the_Error|annotating]] the error, because it involves embedding an actual error instance, preserving its unique identity, instead of concatenating strings. The wrapped error can be accessed with the <code[[#errors.Unwrap.28.29|errors.Unwrap()]]</code> function, and the error tree can be navigated recursively this way. | In all these cases, the source error remains available for further inspection. This is different from and more than [[Go_Language_Error_Handling#Annotate_the_Error|annotating]] the error, because it involves embedding an actual error instance, preserving its unique identity, instead of concatenating strings. The wrapped error can be accessed with the <code>[[#errors.Unwrap.28.29|errors.Unwrap()]]</code> function, and the error tree can be navigated recursively this way. | ||
One disadvantage of error wrapping is that introduces potential coupling. If a calling layer checks for a specific wrapped error, and the called layer changes its implementation and returns a different wrapped error, this will break the calling layer. If this a problem, [[Go_Language_Error_Handling#Annotate_the_Error|annotating]] the errors instead of wrapping them is a better approach. | One disadvantage of error wrapping is that introduces potential coupling. If a calling layer checks for a specific wrapped error, and the called layer changes its implementation and returns a different wrapped error, this will break the calling layer. If this a problem, [[Go_Language_Error_Handling#Annotate_the_Error|annotating]] the errors instead of wrapping them is a better approach. | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | ||
if err != nil { | if err != nil { | ||
outer := fmt.Errorf("additional context | outer := fmt.Errorf("%w: additional context", err) | ||
return outer | return outer | ||
} | } | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<code>fmt.Errorf()</code> call creates a new error instance whose <code>Error()</code> method concatenates the error message provided as argument and the inner error message: | <code>fmt.Errorf()</code> call creates a new error instance whose <code>Error()</code> method concatenates the error message provided as argument and the inner error message: | ||
<font size=-1> | <font size=-1> | ||
original context: additional context | |||
</font> | </font> | ||
The outer error assumes the logical identity of the inner error: the outer error "is" all its inner errors. This can be checked programmatically with <code>errors.Is()</code> function: | The outer error assumes the logical identity of the inner error: '''the outer error "is" all its inner errors'''. This can be checked programmatically with <code>errors.Is()</code> function: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | ||
errors.Is(outer, err) // returns true | errors.Is(outer, err) // returns true | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
The behavior of <code>errors.Unwrap()</code> seems to be a bit [[#Unwrap_Inconsistency|inconsistent]] in this situation: it won't return the error instances, but <code>nil</code>. This seems to imply that <code>fmt.Errors()</code> should only be used to wrap a single error. | The behavior of <code>errors.Unwrap()</code> seems to be a bit [[#Unwrap_Inconsistency|inconsistent]] in this situation: it won't return the error instances, but <code>nil</code>. This seems to imply that <code>fmt.Errors()</code> should only be used to wrap a single error. | ||
==Wrap a Lower Error with a Sentinel Error== | |||
This pattern is useful when we want to add "typing" to a lower error, not just annotate it to a message. | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
var ErrServiceFailure = errors.New("service failure") | |||
func processServiceResponse() (string, err) { | |||
result, err := service.invoke() | |||
if err != nil { | |||
// we bubble up the underlying service failure, but we | |||
// annotate it with a "typed" ErrServiceFailure, which can | |||
// then be identified with errors.Is() | |||
return "", fmt.Errorf("%w: %w", ErrServiceFailure, err) | |||
} | |||
// process response | |||
// return response-related errors | |||
... | |||
return "", fmt.Errorf("unexpected result: %s", result) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
==<tt>errors.Join()</tt>== | ==<tt>errors.Join()</tt>== | ||
Line 62: | Line 86: | ||
The presence of a '''specific error instance''' wrapped inside an outer error, as a direct or indirect descendant in the error tree rooted in the outer error, can be confirmed with <code>errors.Is(<outer_error>, <sought_for_error>)</code> function. The function introspects the <code>outer_error</code>'s error tree by repeatedly calling <code>Unwrap()</code>. | The presence of a '''specific error instance''' wrapped inside an outer error, as a direct or indirect descendant in the error tree rooted in the outer error, can be confirmed with <code>errors.Is(<outer_error>, <sought_for_error>)</code> function. The function introspects the <code>outer_error</code>'s error tree by repeatedly calling <code>Unwrap()</code>. | ||
Always prefer <code>errors.Is()</code> over | Always prefer <code>errors.Is()</code> over the <code>==</code> equality operator. <code>errors.Is()</code> is designed to work with both individual errors and wrapped errors. Furthermore, <code>errors.Is()</code> is safe to use if the first argument, <code>outer_error</code> is <code>nil</code>. | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | ||
orig := fmt.Errorf("original error") | orig := fmt.Errorf("original error") | ||
Line 74: | Line 98: | ||
==<tt>errors.As()</tt>== | ==<tt>errors.As()</tt>== | ||
{{External|https://pkg.go.dev/errors#As}} | {{External|https://pkg.go.dev/errors#As}} | ||
<code>errors.As(<outer_error>, <an_error_similar_to_the_error_sought_after>)</code> provides a safe way to locate the first error in the error tree that matches the '''error type''' of the error instance provided as the second argument. If no match is found, the function returns false. The function introspects the <code>outer_error</code>'s error tree by repeatedly calling <code>Unwrap()</code>. <code>errors.As()</code> is similar, but weaker form of <code>errors.Is()</code> with the difference that types, and not identities are compared. | <code>errors.As(<outer_error>, <an_error_similar_to_the_error_sought_after>)</code> provides a safe way to locate the first error in the error tree that matches the '''error type''' of the error instance provided as the second argument. If no match is found, the function returns false. The function introspects the <code>outer_error</code>'s error tree by repeatedly calling <code>Unwrap()</code>. <code>errors.As()</code> is similar, but weaker form of <code>errors.Is()</code> with the difference that types, and not identities are compared. Always prefer <code>errors.As()</code> over type assertions. | ||
==<tt>errors.Unwrap()</tt>== | ==<tt>errors.Unwrap()</tt>== |
Latest revision as of 23:38, 6 September 2024
External
Internal
Overview
The error mechanism in Go allows "wrapping" error instances into other error instances, while preserving the wrapped error identity. This pattern supports building an error tree that is useful in preserving context.
Error wrapping should be the preferred pattern to use when we want to provide additional context to an error
Error wrapping and returning the result to the upper layer is just one of the error handling patterns in Go. The others are fully handling the error without returning it, simply returning it without any modification, and returning a new annotated error.
This pattern consists in wrapping an error returned by the underlying layer into an "outer" error instance. This is typically done to add information relevant to the context that caught the error being processed. For example, if access to a database fails with access denied, handing the error may consist in wrapping the original error into a new error that also includes the user and the operation, which is richer context that can help with troubleshooting the problem by the operators of the program.
Another situation when wrapping the error is useful is when we want to mark the error as a specific type by wrapping into a custom error type. For example, the same access denied to the database can be wrapped into a "Forbidden" error type, so a hypothetical HTTP handling layer that receives the error returns a 403 status code.
These approaches can be combined: we can at the same time add more context and mark an error.
In all these cases, the source error remains available for further inspection. This is different from and more than annotating the error, because it involves embedding an actual error instance, preserving its unique identity, instead of concatenating strings. The wrapped error can be accessed with the errors.Unwrap()
function, and the error tree can be navigated recursively this way.
One disadvantage of error wrapping is that introduces potential coupling. If a calling layer checks for a specific wrapped error, and the called layer changes its implementation and returns a different wrapped error, this will break the calling layer. If this a problem, annotating the errors instead of wrapping them is a better approach.
Wrap the Error
Individual errors are typically wrapped with fmt.Errorf()
. To wrap multiple error instances into a single outer error, use errors.Join()
.
Wrap an Individual Error
A typical error handling pattern is to handle an error returned by a function invocation by "wrapping" it into an outer error instance that provides additional context, in form of an addition error text message.The approach is different from annotating the error because it creates a new error instance while preserving the identity of the wrapped error. The wrapped error is still reachable by introspecting the error tree with methods like errors.Is()
or errors.As()
.
The error is wrapped with fmt.Errorf()
and %w
conversion character:
if err != nil {
outer := fmt.Errorf("%w: additional context", err)
return outer
}
fmt.Errorf()
call creates a new error instance whose Error()
method concatenates the error message provided as argument and the inner error message:
original context: additional context
The outer error assumes the logical identity of the inner error: the outer error "is" all its inner errors. This can be checked programmatically with errors.Is()
function:
errors.Is(outer, err) // returns true
The outer error becomes the direct ancestor of the wrapped error, and successive invocations of the fmt.Errorf()
result in an error tree, where the identity of the wrapped errors can be checked with errors.Is()
. More details on errors.Is()
can be found below. The wrapped error can be obtained from the outer error by calling errors.Unwrap()
.
Invoking fmt.Errorf() with More that One Error Argument
fmt.Errorf()
is conventionally invoked with just one "%w" conversion character and one error argument. This results in building a degenerated tree that is in fact a linked list. However, more than one error can be provided as argument to fmt.Errorf()
:
err := fmt.Errorf("err")
err2 := fmt.Errorf("err2")
outer := fmt.Errorf("outer: %w %w", err, err2)
println(errors.Is(outer, err)) // prints true
println(errors.Is(outer, err2)) // prints true
The behavior of errors.Unwrap()
seems to be a bit inconsistent in this situation: it won't return the error instances, but nil
. This seems to imply that fmt.Errors()
should only be used to wrap a single error.
Wrap a Lower Error with a Sentinel Error
This pattern is useful when we want to add "typing" to a lower error, not just annotate it to a message.
var ErrServiceFailure = errors.New("service failure")
func processServiceResponse() (string, err) {
result, err := service.invoke()
if err != nil {
// we bubble up the underlying service failure, but we
// annotate it with a "typed" ErrServiceFailure, which can
// then be identified with errors.Is()
return "", fmt.Errorf("%w: %w", ErrServiceFailure, err)
}
// process response
// return response-related errors
...
return "", fmt.Errorf("unexpected result: %s", result)
}
errors.Join()
Join returns an error that wraps the given errors. Any nil
error values are discarded. Join returns nil
if every value provided as argument is nil
. The error formats as the concatenation of the strings obtained by calling the Error()
method of each element, with a newline between each string.
Inspect the Error Tree
errors.Is()
The presence of a specific error instance wrapped inside an outer error, as a direct or indirect descendant in the error tree rooted in the outer error, can be confirmed with errors.Is(<outer_error>, <sought_for_error>)
function. The function introspects the outer_error
's error tree by repeatedly calling Unwrap()
.
Always prefer errors.Is()
over the ==
equality operator. errors.Is()
is designed to work with both individual errors and wrapped errors. Furthermore, errors.Is()
is safe to use if the first argument, outer_error
is nil
.
orig := fmt.Errorf("original error")
intermediate := fmt.Errorf("intermediate error: %w", orig)
outer := fmt.Errorf("final intermediate error: %w", intermediate)
println(errors.Is(outer, intermediate)) // prints "true"
println(errors.Is(outer, orig)) // prints "true"
println(errors.Is(intermediate, orig)) // prints "true"
errors.As()
errors.As(<outer_error>, <an_error_similar_to_the_error_sought_after>)
provides a safe way to locate the first error in the error tree that matches the error type of the error instance provided as the second argument. If no match is found, the function returns false. The function introspects the outer_error
's error tree by repeatedly calling Unwrap()
. errors.As()
is similar, but weaker form of errors.Is()
with the difference that types, and not identities are compared. Always prefer errors.As()
over type assertions.
errors.Unwrap()
errors.Unwrap(<outer_error>)
returns the inner error instance wrapped inside the outer error by a fmt.Errorf("%w")
call. errors.Unwrap()
does not unwrap errors returned by errors.Join()
.
orig := fmt.Errorf("original error")
intermediate := fmt.Errorf("intermediate error: %w", orig)
outer := fmt.Errorf("final intermediate error: %w", intermediate)
println(errors.Unwrap(outer) == intermediate) // prints true
println(errors.Unwrap(intermediate) == orig) // prints true
When more than one errors is wrapped with fmt.Errorf()
, errors.Unwrap()
returns nil
. This seems to be a bit inconsistent, and implies that fmt.Errorf()
should only be used to wrap single errors.
Unwrap() errror Implementation
Example: