Github.com/stretchr/testify: Difference between revisions
(93 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Internal= | =Internal= | ||
* [[Go_Testing#Helper_Packages|Go Testing]] | * [[Go_Testing#Helper_Packages|Go Testing]] | ||
* [[Go_test_Command#Overview|<tt>go test</tt>]] | |||
=TODO= | |||
<font color=darkkhaki> | |||
TO PROCESS: | |||
* https://tychoish.com/post/against-testify/ | |||
</font> | |||
=Overview= | =Overview= | ||
Testify wraps around and delegates to the standard <code>[[Go_Testing#Overview|testing]]</code> package. | |||
=Installation= | =Installation= | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang='bash'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='bash'> | ||
Line 10: | Line 20: | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
=Programming Model= | =Programming Model= | ||
==<tt>require</tt> and <tt>assert</tt>== | |||
{{Internal|Testify require and assert#Overview|Testify <tt>require</tt> and <tt>assert</tt>}} | |||
==Mocks== | |||
{{External|https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/mock}} | |||
The Testify <code>mock</code> package provides a system by which it is possible to mock objects and verify calls into those objects are happening as expected. Mocking with Testify is based on the assumption that we want to construct [[Software_Testing_Concepts#Mock|mock instances]] to replace in testing [[Go_Interfaces#Overview|interface-defined]] real instances. Mocks can stand in for [[Software_Testing_Concepts#External_Dependency|external dependencies]] or other complex components defined by their interfaces. | |||
The programming model requires to: | |||
* [[#Start_with_an_Interface|start with an interface]], which will be implemented by the mock | |||
* [[#Defining_the_Mock|define]] the mock structure | |||
* [[#Instantiate_the_Mock|instantiate]] it with <code>new()</code> or <code>&SomeInterfaceMock{}</code> | |||
* [[#Set_Up_Expectations|configure its behavior]], by configuring its methods' responses to invocations | |||
* [[#Test_with_the_Mock_and_Verify_the_Results|pass]] it to the code that needs to be tested | |||
* [[#Test_with_the_Mock_and_Verify_the_Results|run]] the code that needs to be tested | |||
* [[#Test_with_the_Mock_and_Verify_the_Results|ensure]] the code behave correctly, knowing that the mock returned what we instructed it to return | |||
* optionally, [[#Assert_Expectations|assert expectations]] on the mock: where the methods called? | |||
===Start with an Interface=== | |||
Let's assume that the instances we want to mock are defined by the <code>Something</code> interface, declared as follows: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
package somepkg | |||
type Something interface { | |||
SomeFunc(s string, i int) (string, error) | |||
SomeOtherFunc(s string) (string, error) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
Our mocks will implement that interface and respond to invocations into it. | |||
===<span id='Defining_the_Mock'></span>Define the Mock=== | |||
It's a good idea to encapsulate the mock definition(s) in a package-level <code>mocks_test.go</code> file. If we're testing a <code>somepkg</code> package, then the code lives in the <code>somepkg.go</code> file, the tests live in <code>somepkg_test.go</code> file and the mocks live in <code>mocks_test.go</code>. Note that declaring the mock in a file whose name ends in "_test.go" prevents it from being consumed in other packages, but that should not be a problem. The mocks should be defined in the same package that consumes them for testing, and if you are finding in the position of not being able to consume the mocks, you're doing something wrong. For the same reasons, the type names for mocks and their constructors show always start with a lower case: <code>mockSomething</code>, <code>newMockSomething</code>. | |||
<font size=-2> | |||
. | |||
└── internal | |||
└── somepkg | |||
├── somepkg.go | |||
├── somepkg_test.go | |||
└── mocks_test.go | |||
</font> | |||
The mock, implemented as the <code>mockSomething</code> <code>struct</code>, should be defined in the <code>mocks_test.go</code> file. | |||
<span id='Build_Tags'></span>Optionally, add [[Go_Build_Tags#Controlling_Test_Execution_with_Build_Tags|build tags]] for the type of tests the mocks will be used with: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
//go:build unit_test || integration_test | |||
package somepkg | |||
[...] | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
The mock struct should be declared as a wrapper around the Testify <code>mock.Mock</code> struct, which provides all functionality required to tracks activity on the actual mock object. Aside wrapping around <code>mock.Mock</code>, the struct may declare other fields, as needed. It is common to provide simple implementations to some of the mocked methods that rely on those fields. <code>mockSomething</code> should implement all the methods that are going to be used in testing. Implementation examples are provided below. In the generic case, the method implementation should forward the invocation to the internal mock instance with <code>Called(args)</code> and return what the mock returns as result of <code>Called()</code>. In other specific cases, we may come up with our simple implementation. If we know for sure that a method will not be exercised in testing, it is fine to let it <code>panic("not yet implemented")</code>. | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
//go:build unit_test || integration_test | |||
package somepkg | |||
import "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock" | |||
type mockSomething struct { | |||
mock.Mock | |||
// other fields may be added here | |||
} | |||
// Something interface implementation | |||
func (s *mockSomething) SomeFunc(sa string, i int) (string, error) { | |||
r := s.Called(sa, i) | |||
return r.String(0), r.Error(1) | |||
} | |||
func (s *mockSomething) SomeOtherFunc(sa string) (string, error) { | |||
panic("not yet implemented") | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
For arbitrary type objects, use <code>Arguments.Get(index)</code> and make a type assertion. This may cause a panic if the object you are getting is <code>nil</code>, the type assertion will fail, and in those cases you should check for <code>nil</code> first: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
func (s *mockSomething) SomeFunc2(...) (*SomeType, *SomeOtherType) { | |||
r := s.Called(sa, i) | |||
return r.Get(0).(*SomeType), r.Get(1).(* SomeOtherType) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
===Instantiate the Mock=== | |||
Instantiate the mock in the testing code with <code>new()</code> or <code>&mockSomething{}</code>: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | ||
func TestSomething(t *testing.T) { | |||
mock := new(mockSomething) | |||
// or mock := &mockSomething{} | |||
[...] | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
===Set Up Expectations=== | |||
After instantiation, we configure the mock's behavior by configuring its methods' responses to invocations. Testify calls this stage "setting up the expectations". | |||
====Defining the Behavior of a Method==== | |||
The <code>On()</code> method may be used to configure the mock to respond in a certain way to a method invocation. If <code>On()</code> is used to set behavior, then the mock can then be queried to assert whether the call actually happened or not, with <code>[[#Assert_Expectations|AssertExpectations()]]</code>. | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
// On(function_name, arguments ...).Return(return_value_1, return_value_2, ...) | |||
mock.On("SomeFunc", "fish", 3).Return("bouillabaisse", nil) | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
When the function is invoked with arguments different than the ones it was configured with, the mock with panic with: | |||
<font size=-1> | |||
mock: Unexpected Method Call | |||
</font> | |||
We can use specific argument values when configuring the method behavior, like in the example above, or we can use placeholders (<code>mock.Anything</code>) for each argument where the data being passed in is dynamically generated and cannot be predicted beforehand: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
import ( | import ( | ||
"testing" | |||
testifymock "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock" | |||
) | ) | ||
func | [...] | ||
mock.On("SomeFunc", testifymock.Anything, testifymock.Anything).Return("bouillabaisse", nil) | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
{{Warn|It is important to use the same number of arguments as in the method signature when configuring the mock with <code>On()</code> and <code>Anything</code>}} | |||
===Test with the Mock and Verify the Results=== | |||
Pass the mock to the code that needs to be tested, run the code and ensure it behaves correctly, knowing that the mock returnes what we instructed it to return. | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
// this is the code to be tested | |||
func Usage(si Something, s string, i int) (string, error) { | |||
return si.SomeFunc(s, i) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
This is the test: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) { | |||
assert := tassert.New(t) | |||
mock := new(mockSomething) | |||
mock.On("SomeFunc", "fish", 3).Return("bouillabaisse", nil) | |||
sr, err := Usage(mock, "fish", 3) | |||
assert.Equal("bouillabaisse", sr) | |||
assert.Nil(err) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
===Assert Expectations=== | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) { | |||
[...] | |||
mock.AssertExpectations(t) | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
<code>AssertExpectations</code> asserts that everything specified with <code>On()</code> and <code>Return</code> was in fact called as expected. Calls may have occurred in any order. | |||
Other method that can be used to assert invocations with a finer granularity: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
mock.AssertCalled(t, methodName string, arguments ...interface{}) | |||
mock.AssertNotCalled(t, methodName string, arguments ...interface{}) | |||
mock.AssertNumberOfCalls(t, methodName string, expectedCalls int) | |||
mock.Called(...) | |||
mock.IsMethodCallable(...) | |||
mock.MethodCalled(...) | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
===Reconfigure=== | |||
The mock instances can be "unconfigured" with <code>Unset()</code> invoked on the result of <code>On()</code> and then reconfigured again with <code>On</code>: | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang='go'> | |||
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) { | |||
// | mockCall := mock.On("SomeFunc", ....) | ||
// | // test | ||
[...] | |||
mock.AssertExpectations(t) | |||
// unset | |||
mockCall.Unset() | |||
// reconfigure | |||
mockCall := mock.On("SomeFunc", ....) | |||
// test | |||
[...] | |||
} | } | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> |
Latest revision as of 00:34, 13 March 2024
External
Internal
TODO
TO PROCESS:
Overview
Testify wraps around and delegates to the standard testing
package.
Installation
go get github.com/stretchr/testify
Programming Model
require and assert
Mocks
The Testify mock
package provides a system by which it is possible to mock objects and verify calls into those objects are happening as expected. Mocking with Testify is based on the assumption that we want to construct mock instances to replace in testing interface-defined real instances. Mocks can stand in for external dependencies or other complex components defined by their interfaces.
The programming model requires to:
- start with an interface, which will be implemented by the mock
- define the mock structure
- instantiate it with
new()
or&SomeInterfaceMock{}
- configure its behavior, by configuring its methods' responses to invocations
- pass it to the code that needs to be tested
- run the code that needs to be tested
- ensure the code behave correctly, knowing that the mock returned what we instructed it to return
- optionally, assert expectations on the mock: where the methods called?
Start with an Interface
Let's assume that the instances we want to mock are defined by the Something
interface, declared as follows:
package somepkg
type Something interface {
SomeFunc(s string, i int) (string, error)
SomeOtherFunc(s string) (string, error)
}
Our mocks will implement that interface and respond to invocations into it.
Define the Mock
It's a good idea to encapsulate the mock definition(s) in a package-level mocks_test.go
file. If we're testing a somepkg
package, then the code lives in the somepkg.go
file, the tests live in somepkg_test.go
file and the mocks live in mocks_test.go
. Note that declaring the mock in a file whose name ends in "_test.go" prevents it from being consumed in other packages, but that should not be a problem. The mocks should be defined in the same package that consumes them for testing, and if you are finding in the position of not being able to consume the mocks, you're doing something wrong. For the same reasons, the type names for mocks and their constructors show always start with a lower case: mockSomething
, newMockSomething
.
. └── internal └── somepkg ├── somepkg.go ├── somepkg_test.go └── mocks_test.go
The mock, implemented as the mockSomething
struct
, should be defined in the mocks_test.go
file.
Optionally, add build tags for the type of tests the mocks will be used with:
//go:build unit_test || integration_test
package somepkg
[...]
The mock struct should be declared as a wrapper around the Testify mock.Mock
struct, which provides all functionality required to tracks activity on the actual mock object. Aside wrapping around mock.Mock
, the struct may declare other fields, as needed. It is common to provide simple implementations to some of the mocked methods that rely on those fields. mockSomething
should implement all the methods that are going to be used in testing. Implementation examples are provided below. In the generic case, the method implementation should forward the invocation to the internal mock instance with Called(args)
and return what the mock returns as result of Called()
. In other specific cases, we may come up with our simple implementation. If we know for sure that a method will not be exercised in testing, it is fine to let it panic("not yet implemented")
.
//go:build unit_test || integration_test
package somepkg
import "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
type mockSomething struct {
mock.Mock
// other fields may be added here
}
// Something interface implementation
func (s *mockSomething) SomeFunc(sa string, i int) (string, error) {
r := s.Called(sa, i)
return r.String(0), r.Error(1)
}
func (s *mockSomething) SomeOtherFunc(sa string) (string, error) {
panic("not yet implemented")
}
For arbitrary type objects, use Arguments.Get(index)
and make a type assertion. This may cause a panic if the object you are getting is nil
, the type assertion will fail, and in those cases you should check for nil
first:
func (s *mockSomething) SomeFunc2(...) (*SomeType, *SomeOtherType) {
r := s.Called(sa, i)
return r.Get(0).(*SomeType), r.Get(1).(* SomeOtherType)
}
Instantiate the Mock
Instantiate the mock in the testing code with new()
or &mockSomething{}
:
func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
mock := new(mockSomething)
// or mock := &mockSomething{}
[...]
}
Set Up Expectations
After instantiation, we configure the mock's behavior by configuring its methods' responses to invocations. Testify calls this stage "setting up the expectations".
Defining the Behavior of a Method
The On()
method may be used to configure the mock to respond in a certain way to a method invocation. If On()
is used to set behavior, then the mock can then be queried to assert whether the call actually happened or not, with AssertExpectations()
.
// On(function_name, arguments ...).Return(return_value_1, return_value_2, ...)
mock.On("SomeFunc", "fish", 3).Return("bouillabaisse", nil)
When the function is invoked with arguments different than the ones it was configured with, the mock with panic with:
mock: Unexpected Method Call
We can use specific argument values when configuring the method behavior, like in the example above, or we can use placeholders (mock.Anything
) for each argument where the data being passed in is dynamically generated and cannot be predicted beforehand:
import (
"testing"
testifymock "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
)
[...]
mock.On("SomeFunc", testifymock.Anything, testifymock.Anything).Return("bouillabaisse", nil)
It is important to use the same number of arguments as in the method signature when configuring the mock withOn()
andAnything
Test with the Mock and Verify the Results
Pass the mock to the code that needs to be tested, run the code and ensure it behaves correctly, knowing that the mock returnes what we instructed it to return.
// this is the code to be tested
func Usage(si Something, s string, i int) (string, error) {
return si.SomeFunc(s, i)
}
This is the test:
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) {
assert := tassert.New(t)
mock := new(mockSomething)
mock.On("SomeFunc", "fish", 3).Return("bouillabaisse", nil)
sr, err := Usage(mock, "fish", 3)
assert.Equal("bouillabaisse", sr)
assert.Nil(err)
}
Assert Expectations
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) {
[...]
mock.AssertExpectations(t)
}
AssertExpectations
asserts that everything specified with On()
and Return
was in fact called as expected. Calls may have occurred in any order.
Other method that can be used to assert invocations with a finer granularity:
mock.AssertCalled(t, methodName string, arguments ...interface{})
mock.AssertNotCalled(t, methodName string, arguments ...interface{})
mock.AssertNumberOfCalls(t, methodName string, expectedCalls int)
mock.Called(...)
mock.IsMethodCallable(...)
mock.MethodCalled(...)
Reconfigure
The mock instances can be "unconfigured" with Unset()
invoked on the result of On()
and then reconfigured again with On
:
func TestUsage(t *testing.T) {
mockCall := mock.On("SomeFunc", ....)
// test
[...]
mock.AssertExpectations(t)
// unset
mockCall.Unset()
// reconfigure
mockCall := mock.On("SomeFunc", ....)
// test
[...]
}