Objectives and Key Results (OKR): Difference between revisions

From NovaOrdis Knowledge Base
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
=Internal=
=Internal=
* [[Leadership#Subjects|Leadership]]
* [[Leadership#Subjects|Leadership]]
=Overview=
* Provide a framework to '''focus''' efforts on what matters for the organization.
* Once the direction is clear, the framework helps with '''committing''' to priorities.
* Helps '''aligning''' the teams and connecting horizontally. Communication function. That is important for the OKRs to be published and visible.
* '''Accountability''' and '''measurability'''. We know where we are and we can course correct, in the current cycle and the next.
=TODO=
=TODO=
<font color=darkgray>
<font color=darkgray>

Latest revision as of 21:55, 15 November 2021

External

Books

Internal

Overview

  • Provide a framework to focus efforts on what matters for the organization.
  • Once the direction is clear, the framework helps with committing to priorities.
  • Helps aligning the teams and connecting horizontally. Communication function. That is important for the OKRs to be published and visible.
  • Accountability and measurability. We know where we are and we can course correct, in the current cycle and the next.

TODO

  • Difference between organization OKR and individual OKR.
  • Define visibility and transparence. Objectives and results must be publicly visible.
  • Relationship between OKRs and compensation. Ideally there should not be one.
  • Relationship between OKRs and Jira epics.
  • Output vs. outcome. Sounds like semantics. Search for "Should OKRs focus on output or outcomes?" in here.
  • Horizontal vs vertical communication and connection.
  • Render the company map and identify opportunities for horizontal collaboration.