Kubernetes Pod and Container Security: Difference between revisions
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
For more details on how the <code>runAsUser</code> setting influences mount point permissions, see: {{Internal|Kubernetes_Mounting_Volumes_in_Pods#Permissions|Mounting Volumes in Pods | Permissions}} | For more details on how the <code>runAsUser</code> setting influences mount point permissions, see: {{Internal|Kubernetes_Mounting_Volumes_in_Pods#Permissions|Mounting Volumes in Pods | Permissions}} | ||
The setting is subject to the applicable [[ | The setting is subject to the applicable [[Kubernetes_Pod_Security_Policy_Concepts#PodSecurityPolicy|PodSecurityPolicy]] configuration: | ||
<syntaxhighlight lang='yaml'> | <syntaxhighlight lang='yaml'> | ||
kind: PodSecurityPolicy | kind: PodSecurityPolicy | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 4 March 2021
External
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.19/#podsecuritycontext-v1-core
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.19/#securitycontext-v1-core
Internal
Overview
A container instantiated from its image by a container runtime executes by default with access control settings and privileges defined in the image metadata. For example the user and the group various container processes run under are by default specified with the USER directive in the container image. The processes in the container run by default in unprivileged mode and get by default only a limited set of Linux capabilities. The pod and container security contexts, described below, are a declarative method to modify all these run-time settings and get the containers to run with a different runtime configuration. As the name implies, all configuration elements controlled by security contexts are security sensitive. All privileges and access control settings requested by the security context are subject to verification and override by pod security policies. The cluster admin can restrict the use of the security-related features by creating one or more PodSecurityPolicy resources.
Pod Security Context
The pod security context is a pod-wide section of the pod manifest that defines privileges and access control settings for the pod and all containers running in the pod.
The pod security context holds pod-level security attributes and common container settings that apply to all containers in the pod. Some configuration elements, such as those referring to the pod's volumes, make sense at the pod level only. Other configuration elements, such as the UID or the GID containers run with, are shared with the container security contexts, and when specified in the pod security context, apply to all containers in the pod. Those fields can be overridden by the per-container security context. If the same configuration element is set in both the container security context and the pod security context, the value set in the container security context takes precedence.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 3000
runAsNonRoot: true
fsGroup: 2000
[...]
Elements Specific to the Pod Security Context
Container Security Context
Each container may have its own security context definition:
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 3000
runAsNonRoot: true
fsGroup: 2000
[...]
Elements Specific to the Container Security Context
Pod Security Policy
A pod security policy is a cluster-level API resource that specifies required values or limits for security-sensitive aspects for pod and container configurations, as configured by the pod security context and container security context. If those values are not present in the pod configuration, the pod security policy provides default values. For more details on pod security policies, see:
Privileges and Access Control Settings
The following sections document privileges and access control settings that can be set and modified with pod and container security policies and pod seucirty context.
Discretionary Access Control
The permissions to access files in a container are based on the User ID and Group ID. More about Discretionary Access Control is available here:
runAsUser
Can be used to specify a UID to run with. It is an integer, it must not quoted in the YAML manifest.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
[...]
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
runAsUser: 2000
[...]
If not specified in any context, the container metadata USER directive will be used. If no USER metadata is present, the UID will default to root (0). Both pod security context and container security context allow declaring runAsUser.
For more details on how the runAsUser setting influences mount point permissions, see:
The setting is subject to the applicable PodSecurityPolicy configuration:
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
[...]
spec:
[...]
runAsUser:
rule: RunAsAny
runAsGroup
Provides the GID to run the entrypoint of the container process. The GID will also be reported as part of the user's groups. It is an integer, it must not quoted in the YAML manifest.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 2000
[...]
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
runAsUser: 3000
runAsGroup: 4000
[...]
If not set, the container image value is used, and if that is not set, the primary group ID of the container will be root(0). Both pod security context and container security context allow declaring runAsGroup.
runAsGroup cannot be specified without being accompanied by runAsUser. If only runAsGroup is used, the pod will not start with an "runAsGroup is specified without a runAsUser" error message.
For more details on how the runAsGroup setting influences mount point permissions, see:
The setting is subject to the applicable PodSecurityPolicy configuration:
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
[...]
spec:
[...]
runAsGroup:
rule: RunAsAny
runAsNonRoot
Although containers are mostly isolated from the host system, running their processes are root is considered bad practice. For example, when a host directory is mounted into the container, if the process running in the container is running as root, it has full access to the mounted directory. As such, it is common to prevent running a container process as root, regardless of what the container metadata configuration contains. This can be achieved by setting runAsNonRoot to "true". When set to "true", runAsNonRoot will prevent a container whose user was set to root in the container metadata from running in that configuration. Both pod security context and container security context allow declaring runAsNonRoot.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
[...]
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
[...]
If runAsNonRoot is set to true and the container attempts to run as root, the pod will end up with a "CreateContainerConfigError" status and an error message along the lines of:
"Error: container has runAsNonRoot and image will run as root".
supplementalGroups
supplementalGroups it is a pod-level setting that contains a list of groups applied to the first process run in each container, in addition to the container's primary GID. If unspecified, no groups will be added to any container. Also see:
File System Access Control
readOnlyRootFilesystem
readOnlyRootFilesystem allows configuration that prevents processes from writing the container's root filesystem. If set to "true", the policy will enforce that the containers will run with a read-only root filesystem (i.e. no writable layer). Mounted volumes can be written. This is a common security practice. readOnlyRootFilesystem can only be set at container security context level.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
readOnlyRootFileSystem: true
[...]
This configuration can be enforced in the PodSecurityPolicy:
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
spec:
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
[...]
If the container attempts to write, it'll transition to status "CrashLoopBackOff". The cause is described in the container logs:
[Sat Sep 05 04:07:00.410595 2020] [core:error] [pid 1:tid 140116758865024] (30)Read-only file system: AH00099: could not create /usr/local/apache2/logs/httpd.pid
fsGroup
fsGroup is a pod-level setting that specifies a special supplemental group ID applying to all containers in the pod. It is an integer, it must not quoted in the YAML manifest.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
securityContext:
fsGroup: 3333
[...]
"id" executed from a container that belongs to a pod configured as such return the fsGroup among its "groups":
# id
uid=1111 gid=2222 groups=2222,3333
Some volume types allow the Kubelet to change the ownership of that volume, as projected in the pod, to be owned by the pod:
- The owning GID will be the fsGroup
- The setgid bit is set. New files created in the volume will be owned by fsGroup.
- The permission bits are OR'd with rw-rw----
If not set, the Kubelet will not modify the ownership and permissions of any volume.
When fsGroups is supported, the mounted volume shows that it is owned by the fsGroup group:
# ls -ld /data
drwxrwsrwx 2 root 3333 4096 Mar 2 21:17 /data
A file created inside the volume from a pod configured with fsGroup, the file is owned by the user executing the pod and by the fsGroup group:
# touch some-file
# ls -l some-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 1111 3333 0 Mar 2 21:29 some-file
Note that files created outside the volumes configured with fsGroup belong to the primary group of the user.
For more details on how the fsGroup setting influences mount point permissions, see:
Also see:
Volume Types that Support fsGroup
- emptyDir
- secret (note that for "secret" volumes, fsGroups has implications on how the secrets are projected into the pods, see more about this subject here: 'secret' Volumes.
- Some volumes exposed via CSI. See https://kubernetes-csi.github.io/docs/support-fsgroup.html
Volume Types that Do Not Support fsGroup
For the following volumes, setting fsGroup does not have any effect:
- Docker Desktop Kubernetes hostPath: it will create the files with runAsGroup or root if runAsGroup not set.
- EKS with EFS exposed as PVs
fsGroupChangePolicy
fsGroupChangePolicy it is a pod-level setting that defines behavior of changing ownership and permission of the volume before being exposed inside pod. This field will only apply to volume types which support fsGroup based ownership (and permissions). It will have no effect on ephemeral volume types such as: secret, configmaps and emptydir. Valid values are "OnRootMismatch" and "Always". If not specified defaults to "Always".
allowedProcMountTypes
sysctls
forbiddenSysctls
allowedUnsafeSysctls
Privileged Mode
privileged
This setting allows running the container in privileged mode, meaning that the container gets full access to the node's kernel. privileged can only be set at container security context level.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
containers:
- name: some-container
securityContext:
privileged: true
[...]
The setting is subject to the applicable PodSecurityPolicy configuration:
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
[...]
spec:
privileged: true|false
[...]
More details on privileged mode:
allowPrivilegeEscalation
allowPrivilegeEscalation can only be set at container security context level. This setting controls whether a process can gain more privileges than its parent process. The boolean value directly controls whether the no_new_privs (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt) flag gets set on the container process. allowPrivilegeEscalation is true always when the container is run as privileged or has CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
defaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation
Linux (Kernel) Capabilities
Linux capabilities are a fine-grained mechanism that allows giving a container access only to the kernel features it requires instead of giving it unlimited permissions by making in a privileged container. Also see:
capabilities
This setting allows adding or dropping capabilities on a per-container basis. capabilities can only be set at container security context level.
kind: Pod
[...]
spec:
containers:
- name: some-container
capabilities:
add:
- SYS_TIME
drop:
- CHOWN
[...]
Linux kernel capabilities are usually prefixed with CAP_ (e.g. CAP_SYS_TIME). However, when specifying them in a pod specification, you must leave out the prefix: SYS_TIME.
defaultAddCapabilities
requiredDropCapabilities
allowedCapabilities
SELinux
More details:
seLinuxOptions
Both pod security context and container security context allow declaring seLinuxOptions.
seLinux
Seccomp
Access to Host Namespaces
hostPID, hostIPC, hostNetwork, hostPorts.
Specification of Accepted Volume Types and File System Access Control
volumes, allowedHostPaths, allowedFlexVolumes